Academia incentivizes publishing over peer review. That means too many submissions and not enough reviews, or reviews that are late and low quality.

Reciprocal Reviews breaks this cycle:

  1. Editors set a cost for submissions, priced in review tokens, e.g. 10 tokens.
  2. Authors earn tokens by volunteering for venues, sharing expertise and availability, and submitting on-time, quality reviews, on whatever reviewing platform a venue uses.
  3. Authors spend tokens to submit manuscripts for review, splitting the cost with co-authors. Or, they can gift tokens to individuals or shared pools to strategically support newcomers, colleagues in crisis, or emerging topics.

Because authors need to submit high-quality, on-time reviews to submit, authors get better, faster reviews, editors do less nagging, communities overall have a fairer distribution of peer review labor.